W49B, shown in this photo is the remnants of the end of a super-massive star's life. This super-nova took place about 26,000 LY away, as seen from Earth the explosion took place, according to the Wired article, the object is only about 1000 years old.
(Ok, other than 1000 years old and possibly one of the youngest in the galaxy, something about that statement caught me strange. the
Wired article was worded just as I entered it. 2600 lys away and a 1000 years old. Do you see yet what has me going....ahhhhh what??? Let me explain...and where does my logic fall down? Light travels at light speed, for the most part right? When the super-nova blew, light traveled from it to us. Said star is 26000 LY, we are not interested so much in distance but in time 26,000 years time to be exact. So how can something that blew 26,000 years ago be anything but 26,000 years old? )
Oddities in age not withstanding, W49B is still an odd creature. Looking at it's shape it is evident that the collapse and release of matter was not uniform. You can see from the picture that instead of a uniform globe, the super-nova left huge spikes at what may have been it's poles.
Also, data gathered from the Chandra X-Ray telescope:
- only half of it showed concentrations of iron while sulfur and silicon were spread evenly throughout. This type of explosion, known as a bipolar supernova, has never been seen before in the galaxy.
Chandra can also look "inside" of the nebula cloud:
- Intermediate-mass stars will give rise to neutron stars — heavy, compact objects that emit copious amounts of X-rays or radio pulses. Since these signals are not present, scientists suggest that the star was massive enough to continue the collapse all the way to a black hole.